Bangladesh vs China: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Bangladesh
0.7393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China
0.8885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
13th
China rank
10th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • China
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.8885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.1492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 13th and China ranks 10th of 129 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0342 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1970s 0.0773 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1980s 0.1029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1990s 0.155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3277 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1727 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2000s 0.264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2010s 0.4502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3666 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 0.6915 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8901 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1987 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Bangladesh or China?
China, at 0.8885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Bangladesh and China?
0.1492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and China rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Bangladesh ranks 13th and China ranks 10th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs China: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/china/">Bangladesh vs China: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.