Bangladesh vs Chile: Cabbages — Gross per capita Production Index Number
Bangladesh
160.87
in 2024
Chile
160.78
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
10th
Chile rank
11th
Cabbages — Gross per capita Production Index Number over time
- Bangladesh
- Chile
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 160.87 against 160.78 in Chile, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 10th and Chile ranks 11th of 136 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 39.32 | 97.83 | 58.51 | Chile |
| 1970s | 35.86 | 110.14 | 74.28 | Chile |
| 1980s | 36.95 | 96.92 | 59.98 | Chile |
| 1990s | 44.88 | 190.87 | 146 | Chile |
| 2000s | 64.91 | 146.14 | 81.24 | Chile |
| 2010s | 100.35 | 109.28 | 8.93 | Chile |
| 2020s | 148.49 | 149.22 | 0.728 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cabbages — gross per capita production index number, Bangladesh or Chile?
- Bangladesh, at 160.87 against 160.78 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cabbages — gross per capita production index number between Bangladesh and Chile?
- 0.09, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chile?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Chile rank globally for cabbages — gross per capita production index number?
- Bangladesh ranks 10th and Chile ranks 11th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cabbages — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.