Malaysia vs Nepal: Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Malaysia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nepal
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malaysia rank
69th
Nepal rank
67th
Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Malaysia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malaysia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 67th of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Malaysia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Malaysia and Nepal?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Nepal rank globally for cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Malaysia ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 67th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.