Malawi vs Niger: Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Malawi
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Niger
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi rank
2nd
Niger rank
1st
Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Malawi
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 2nd and Niger ranks 1st of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Niger |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Niger |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Malawi or Niger?
- Niger, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Malawi and Niger?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Niger?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Niger rank globally for cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Malawi ranks 2nd and Niger ranks 1st of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.