Jordan vs Namibia: Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Jordan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Jordan rank
61st
Namibia rank
64th
Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Jordan
- Namibia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 61st and Namibia ranks 64th of 129 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Jordan or Namibia?
- Jordan, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Jordan and Namibia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Namibia rank globally for cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Jordan ranks 61st and Namibia ranks 64th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.