Israel vs Latvia: Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Israel
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Israel rank
72nd
Latvia rank
70th
Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Israel
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Israel, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 72nd and Latvia ranks 70th of 129 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Israel or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Israel and Latvia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Latvia rank globally for cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Israel ranks 72nd and Latvia ranks 70th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.