Congo vs Spain: Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Congo
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Spain
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Congo rank
84th
Spain rank
81st
Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Congo
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 84th and Spain ranks 81st of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Spain in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Congo or Spain?
- Spain, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Congo and Spain?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Spain?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Spain rank globally for cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Congo ranks 84th and Spain ranks 81st of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.