China vs Kazakhstan: Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
China
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
32nd
Kazakhstan rank
31st
Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China ahead.
China ranks 32nd and Kazakhstan ranks 31st of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp, China or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp between China and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do China and Kazakhstan rank globally for cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 32nd and Kazakhstan ranks 31st of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.