China vs Zimbabwe: Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita
China
0.0007 ha per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0008 ha per person
in 2024
China rank
13th
Zimbabwe rank
12th
Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita over time
- China
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0008 ha per person against 0.0007 ha per person in China, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
China ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | China |
| 2000s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | China |
| 2010s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per capita, China or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0008 ha per person against 0.0007 ha per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per capita between China and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Zimbabwe rank globally for cabbages — area harvested, per capita?
- China ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.