Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per capita, Chile or French Polynesia?

French Polynesia, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Chile as of 2024.

What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per capita between Chile and French Polynesia?

0 ha per person, with French Polynesia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and French Polynesia?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs French Polynesia: Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita

Chile

0.0001 ha per person

in 2024

French Polynesia

0.0001 ha per person

in 2024

Chile rank

70th

French Polynesia rank

67th

Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita over time

Chile
French Polynesia

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Chile, a difference of 0 ha per person.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Chile ranks 70th and French Polynesia ranks 67th of 129 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	French Polynesia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 ha per person	0.0005 ha per person	0.0004 ha per person	French Polynesia
1970s	0.0001 ha per person	0.0005 ha per person	0.0004 ha per person	French Polynesia
1980s	0.0001 ha per person	0.0005 ha per person	0.0004 ha per person	French Polynesia
1990s	0.0002 ha per person	0.0003 ha per person	0.0002 ha per person	French Polynesia
2000s	0.0001 ha per person	0.0003 ha per person	0.0002 ha per person	French Polynesia
2010s	0.0001 ha per person	0.0002 ha per person	0.0001 ha per person	French Polynesia
2020s	0.0001 ha per person	0.0001 ha per person	0 ha per person	French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — area harvested, per capita, Chile or French Polynesia?: French Polynesia, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in cabbages — area harvested, per capita between Chile and French Polynesia?: 0 ha per person, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and French Polynesia?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and French Polynesia rank globally for cabbages — area harvested, per capita?: Chile ranks 70th and French Polynesia ranks 67th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs French Polynesia: Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-area-harvested-per-capita/chile/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-area-harvested-per-capita/chile/french-polynesia/">Chile vs French Polynesia: Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cabbages — Area harvested, per capita
Unit: ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 130 places, 6,511 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 28 August 2026

Cabbages — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.