Small Island Developing States vs Sweden: Brans — Stock Variation

Small Island Developing States
15 t
in 2013
Sweden
800 t
in 2013
Small Island Developing States rank
15th
Sweden rank
12th

Brans — Stock Variation over time

  • Small Island Developing States
  • Sweden
-20.0k-10.0k010.0k20.0k196119872013

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 800 t against 15 t in Small Island Developing States, a difference of 785 t.

That makes Sweden's figure about 53.3 times Small Island Developing States's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Small Island Developing States ahead.

Small Island Developing States ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 12th of 28 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Small Island Developing States averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small Island Developing States Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 555.56 t 0 t 555.56 t Small Island Developing States
1970s -500 t 0 t 500 t Sweden
1980s -21 t 0 t 21 t Sweden
1990s -99 t 0 t 99 t Sweden
2000s 107 t 0 t 107 t Small Island Developing States
2010s 32.5 t 0 t 32.5 t Small Island Developing States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher brans — stock variation, Small Island Developing States or Sweden?
Sweden, at 800 t against 15 t in Small Island Developing States as of 2013.
What is the difference in brans — stock variation between Small Island Developing States and Sweden?
785 t, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small Island Developing States and Sweden?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Small Island Developing States and Sweden rank globally for brans — stock variation?
Small Island Developing States ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 12th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small Island Developing States vs Sweden: Brans — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-stock-variation/small-island-developing-states/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-stock-variation/small-island-developing-states/sweden/">Small Island Developing States vs Sweden: Brans — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Brans — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
116 places, 5,677 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.