Namibia vs Ukraine: Brans — Stock Variation
Brans — Stock Variation over time
- Namibia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Ukraine, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Namibia ranks 22nd and Ukraine ranks 22nd of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -6.25 t | 0 t | 6.25 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 5 t | -750 t | 755 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 1,875 t | 1,875 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher brans — stock variation, Namibia or Ukraine?
- Namibia, at 0 t against 0 t in Ukraine as of 2013.
- What is the difference in brans — stock variation between Namibia and Ukraine?
- 0 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Ukraine?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Namibia and Ukraine rank globally for brans — stock variation?
- Namibia ranks 22nd and Ukraine ranks 22nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.