Land Locked Developing Countries vs New Zealand: Brans β€” Stock Variation

Land Locked Developing Countries
300 t
in 2013
New Zealand
200 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
8th
New Zealand rank
16th

Brans β€” Stock Variation over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries
  • New Zealand
-40.0k-20.0k020.0k40.0k196119872013

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries currently reports 300 t against 200 t in New Zealand, a difference of 100 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries's figure about 1.5 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 16th of 12 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1970s -85 t 0 t 85 t New Zealand
1980s -1,912 t -40 t 1,872 t New Zealand
1990s 771 t -360 t 1,131 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2000s 885.5 t 300 t 585.5 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2010s 351.25 t 250 t 101.25 t Land Locked Developing Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher brans β€” stock variation, Land Locked Developing Countries or New Zealand?
Land Locked Developing Countries, at 300 t against 200 t in New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in brans β€” stock variation between Land Locked Developing Countries and New Zealand?
100 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries and New Zealand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries and New Zealand rank globally for brans β€” stock variation?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 16th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries vs New Zealand: Brans β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries/new-zealand/">Land Locked Developing Countries vs New Zealand: Brans β€” Stock Variation</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Brans β€” Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
116 places, 5,677 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.