China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Brans — Production

China, Hong Kong SAR
3,948 t
in 2013
Solomon Islands
3,368 t
in 2013
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
152nd
Solomon Islands rank
153rd

Brans — Production over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Solomon Islands
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119872013

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 3,948 t against 3,368 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 580 t.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 152nd and Solomon Islands ranks 153rd of 166 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 31,824 t 64.33 t 31,760 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 39,841 t 201.7 t 39,640 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 35,562 t 540.1 t 35,022 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 21,523 t 1,401 t 20,121 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 4,887 t 2,274 t 2,613 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 3,650 t 3,573 t 77.25 t China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher brans — production, China, Hong Kong SAR or Solomon Islands?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 3,948 t against 3,368 t in Solomon Islands as of 2013.
What is the difference in brans — production between China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands?
580 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands rank globally for brans — production?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 152nd and Solomon Islands ranks 153rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Brans — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-production/china-hong-kong-sar/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-production/china-hong-kong-sar/solomon-islands/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Brans — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Brans — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
209 places, 10,020 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.