Australia and New Zealand vs Colombia: Brans — Import Quantity

Australia and New Zealand
20,201 t
in 2013
Colombia
21,010 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
49th
Colombia rank
48th

Brans — Import Quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Colombia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119872013

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 21,010 t against 20,201 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 809 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 49th and Colombia ranks 48th of 161 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Colombia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Colombia Difference Ahead
1960s 687.25 t 0 t 687.25 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 549.09 t 0 t 549.09 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 746.65 t 66.7 t 679.95 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 4,675 t 17,261 t 12,586 t Colombia
2000s 20,882 t 6,494 t 14,388 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 21,511 t 19,771 t 1,740 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher brans — import quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Colombia?
Colombia, at 21,010 t against 20,201 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in brans — import quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Colombia?
809 t, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Colombia?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Colombia rank globally for brans — import quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 49th and Colombia ranks 48th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Colombia: Brans — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/colombia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/colombia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Colombia: Brans — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Brans — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 9,789 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.