Australia and New Zealand vs Hungary: Brans — Export Quantity

Australia and New Zealand
73,933 t
in 2013
Hungary
75,909 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
24th
Hungary rank
23rd

Brans — Export Quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Hungary
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119872013

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 75,909 t against 73,933 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1,976 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Hungary ranks 23rd of 151 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Hungary Difference Ahead
1960s 51,986 t 6,919 t 45,068 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 21,282 t 165,449 t 144,167 t Hungary
1980s 4,916 t 124,655 t 119,739 t Hungary
1990s 7,858 t 43,405 t 35,547 t Hungary
2000s 16,274 t 81,645 t 65,372 t Hungary
2010s 72,659 t 75,548 t 2,890 t Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher brans — export quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Hungary?
Hungary, at 75,909 t against 73,933 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in brans — export quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Hungary?
1,976 t, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Hungary?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Hungary rank globally for brans — export quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Hungary ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Hungary: Brans — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-export-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-export-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/hungary/">Australia and New Zealand vs Hungary: Brans — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Brans — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
192 places, 9,150 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.