Lithuania vs Portugal: Bees — Stocks, per capita
Lithuania
0.0784 No per person
in 2024
Portugal
0.0641 No per person
in 2023
Lithuania rank
15th
Portugal rank
17th
Bees — Stocks, per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Portugal
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0784 No per person against 0.0641 No per person in Portugal, a difference of 0.0143 No per person.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 15th and Portugal ranks 17th of 102 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0322 No per person | 0.0255 No per person | 0.0067 No per person | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.0254 No per person | 0.0203 No per person | 0.0052 No per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0409 No per person | 0.0416 No per person | 0.0007 No per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0.0765 No per person | 0.0696 No per person | 0.0069 No per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bees — stocks, per capita, Lithuania or Portugal?
- Lithuania, at 0.0784 No per person against 0.0641 No per person in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bees — stocks, per capita between Lithuania and Portugal?
- 0.0143 No per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Portugal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Portugal rank globally for bees — stocks, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 15th and Portugal ranks 17th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Bees — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bees — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.