Lithuania vs Polynesia: Beer — Stock Variation
Beer — Stock Variation over time
- Lithuania
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 5 1000 t against 4 1000 t in Lithuania, a difference of 1 1000 t.
That makes Polynesia's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Polynesia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 29th and Polynesia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -10.33 1000 t | 0.3333 1000 t | 10.67 1000 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 9.75 1000 t | 4.25 1000 t | 5.5 1000 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beer — stock variation, Lithuania or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 5 1000 t against 4 1000 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in beer — stock variation between Lithuania and Polynesia?
- 1 1000 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Polynesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Polynesia rank globally for beer — stock variation?
- Lithuania ranks 29th and Polynesia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beer — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.