French Polynesia vs Madagascar: Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production, per square kilometre

French Polynesia
0.0497 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
0.0549 t per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
147th
Madagascar rank
144th

Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Madagascar
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0.0549 t per square kilometre against 0.0497 t per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0052 t per square kilometre.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 144th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0762 t per square kilometre 0.1816 t per square kilometre 0.1054 t per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 0.0665 t per square kilometre 0.1943 t per square kilometre 0.1279 t per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 0.0643 t per square kilometre 0.2343 t per square kilometre 0.17 t per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 0.0428 t per square kilometre 0.0937 t per square kilometre 0.0509 t per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 0.0432 t per square kilometre 0.0695 t per square kilometre 0.0263 t per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 0.0438 t per square kilometre 0.0719 t per square kilometre 0.028 t per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 0.0555 t per square kilometre 0.049 t per square kilometre 0.0065 t per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beef and buffalo meat, primary — production, per square kilometre, French Polynesia or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 0.0549 t per square kilometre against 0.0497 t per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in beef and buffalo meat, primary — production, per square kilometre between French Polynesia and Madagascar?
0.0052 t per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Madagascar rank globally for beef and buffalo meat, primary — production, per square kilometre?
French Polynesia ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 144th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Madagascar: Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/beef-and-buffalo-meat-primary-production-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/beef-and-buffalo-meat-primary-production-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/madagascar/">French Polynesia vs Madagascar: Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,625 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.