Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 43.03 million An against 13.37 million An in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 29.65 million An.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 250 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.33 million An | 10.46 million An | 2.14 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 12.17 million An | 12.89 million An | 718,196 An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 11.04 million An | 16.05 million An | 5.01 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 11.73 million An | 22.45 million An | 10.72 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 12.45 million An | 27.94 million An | 15.49 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 12.95 million An | 36.92 million An | 23.96 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 11.86 million An | 41.48 million An | 29.62 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beef and buffalo meat, primary — producing animals/slaughtered, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 43.03 million An against 13.37 million An in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in beef and buffalo meat, primary — producing animals/slaughtered between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 29.65 million An, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for beef and buffalo meat, primary — producing animals/slaughtered?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 250 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.