Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Gross Production Value
Latvia
23,778 1000 SLC
in 2017
Zimbabwe
22,661 1000 SLC
in 2018
Latvia rank
72nd
Zimbabwe rank
73rd
Beans, dry — Gross Production Value over time
- Latvia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 23,778 1000 SLC against 22,661 1000 SLC in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,117 1000 SLC.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 73rd of 98 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 81.38 1000 SLC | 215 1000 SLC | 133.62 1000 SLC | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 140.62 1000 SLC | 17.33 million 1000 SLC | 17.33 million 1000 SLC | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 12,302 1000 SLC | 17,990 1000 SLC | 5,688 1000 SLC | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — gross production value, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
- Latvia, at 23,778 1000 SLC against 22,661 1000 SLC in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — gross production value between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 1,117 1000 SLC, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for beans, dry — gross production value?
- Latvia ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 73rd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (current thousand SLC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.