Romania vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Romania
0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Zimbabwe
0.0467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
66th
Zimbabwe rank
68th

Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Romania
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 112 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.2793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.5207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0814 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.1544 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.1147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0461 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0686 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0633 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beans, dry — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Romania or Zimbabwe?
Romania, at 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
What is the difference in beans, dry — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Romania and Zimbabwe?
0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for beans, dry — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Romania ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/romania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/romania/zimbabwe/">Romania vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
113 places, 5,416 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.