Chile vs Congo: Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Chile
0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
95th
Congo rank
93rd

Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Chile
  • Congo
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 95th and Congo ranks 93rd of 112 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0691 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0867 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.1033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0612 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0339 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beans, dry — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chile or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in beans, dry — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chile and Congo?
0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Congo rank globally for beans, dry — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chile ranks 95th and Congo ranks 93rd of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Congo: Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/congo-rep/">Chile vs Congo: Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
113 places, 5,416 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Beans, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.