Kazakhstan vs Lithuania: Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita
Kazakhstan
0.0238 ha per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0.0236 ha per person
in 2017
Kazakhstan rank
7th
Lithuania rank
8th
Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0238 ha per person against 0.0236 ha per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0002 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 8th of 115 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0052 ha per person | 0.0102 ha per person | 0.005 ha per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — area harvested, per capita, Kazakhstan or Lithuania?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0238 ha per person against 0.0236 ha per person in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — area harvested, per capita between Kazakhstan and Lithuania?
- 0.0002 ha per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Lithuania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Kazakhstan and Lithuania rank globally for beans, dry — area harvested, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 8th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Beans, dry — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.