Eswatini vs Serbia: Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita
Eswatini
0.0012 ha per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.0009 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
57th
Serbia rank
60th
Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Serbia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0012 ha per person against 0.0009 ha per person in Serbia, a difference of 0.0003 ha per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 60th of 115 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0029 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.002 ha per person | 0.0018 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0012 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — area harvested, per capita, Eswatini or Serbia?
- Eswatini, at 0.0012 ha per person against 0.0009 ha per person in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — area harvested, per capita between Eswatini and Serbia?
- 0.0003 ha per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Serbia rank globally for beans, dry — area harvested, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 60th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Beans, dry — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.