Dominica vs Eswatini: Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita
Dominica
0.0012 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0012 ha per person
in 2024
Dominica rank
56th
Eswatini rank
57th
Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Dominica
- Eswatini
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 0.0012 ha per person against 0.0012 ha per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Eswatini ahead.
Dominica ranks 56th and Eswatini ranks 57th of 115 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0028 ha per person | 0.0022 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.002 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0012 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — area harvested, per capita, Dominica or Eswatini?
- Dominica, at 0.0012 ha per person against 0.0012 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — area harvested, per capita between Dominica and Eswatini?
- 0 ha per person, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Eswatini?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Dominica and Eswatini rank globally for beans, dry — area harvested, per capita?
- Dominica ranks 56th and Eswatini ranks 57th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Beans, dry — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.