Japan vs Zambia: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Japan
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
104th
Zambia rank
102nd

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Japan
  • Zambia
00.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 19.9 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 104th and Zambia ranks 102nd of 106 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Japan or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Japan and Zambia?
0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and Zambia rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Japan ranks 104th and Zambia ranks 102nd of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Zambia: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/japan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/japan/zambia/">Japan vs Zambia: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.