Israel vs Jamaica: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Israel
3.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
17th
Jamaica rank
20th

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Israel
  • Jamaica
02468196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 3.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.4 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Israel ranks 17th and Jamaica ranks 20th of 106 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.8491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 1.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 2.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2653 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
2020s 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Israel or Jamaica?
Israel, at 3.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Israel and Jamaica?
0.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Jamaica rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Israel ranks 17th and Jamaica ranks 20th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Jamaica: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/israel/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/israel/jamaica/">Israel vs Jamaica: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.