Eswatini vs Maldives: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Eswatini
0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
0.6107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
44th
Maldives rank
43rd

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Maldives
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 0.6107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.

Eswatini ranks 44th and Maldives ranks 43rd of 106 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Maldives Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1970s 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 0.0152 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 0.053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 0.4491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3352 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Eswatini or Maldives?
Maldives, at 0.6107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Eswatini and Maldives?
0.0235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Maldives?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Maldives rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Eswatini ranks 44th and Maldives ranks 43rd of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Maldives: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/maldives/">Eswatini vs Maldives: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.