Eswatini vs Liberia: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Eswatini
0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
0.5274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
44th
Liberia rank
45th

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Liberia
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0.0598 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 44th and Liberia ranks 45th of 106 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1878 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1970s 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2429 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2183 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.261 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1990s 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
2000s 0.053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3678 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
2010s 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4928 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 0.4491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0782 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Eswatini or Liberia?
Eswatini, at 0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Eswatini and Liberia?
0.0598 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Liberia rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Eswatini ranks 44th and Liberia ranks 45th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Liberia: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/liberia/">Eswatini vs Liberia: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.