Egypt vs Eswatini: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Egypt
0.4851 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
47th
Eswatini rank
44th

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Egypt
  • Eswatini
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4851 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.1021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Egypt ranks 47th and Eswatini ranks 44th of 106 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.0803 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0596 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.1842 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 0.3265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2735 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 0.4348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 0.4557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Egypt or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4851 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Egypt and Eswatini?
0.1021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Eswatini rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Egypt ranks 47th and Eswatini ranks 44th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Eswatini: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/eswatini/">Egypt vs Eswatini: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.