Dominica vs Malawi: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Dominica
5.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
4.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
10th
Malawi rank
13th

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Dominica
  • Malawi
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 5.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominica's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.

Dominica ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 13th of 106 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 20.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
1970s 17.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 22.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 22.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 22.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 10.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 6.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 5.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Dominica or Malawi?
Dominica, at 5.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Dominica and Malawi?
1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Malawi rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Dominica ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 13th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Malawi: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/dominica/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/dominica/malawi/">Dominica vs Malawi: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.