Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Cuba
0.2967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2883 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
58th
Zimbabwe rank
60th

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.2967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2883 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 106 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.3279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2879 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.6059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5477 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0737 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9836 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.8257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1916 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.7103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Cuba, at 0.2967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2883 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Cuba ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.