China vs Mexico: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

China
0.4559 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.4833 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
49th
Mexico rank
48th

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • China
  • Mexico
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.4833 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4559 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

China ranks 49th and Mexico ranks 48th of 106 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.1125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.2562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.432 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 0.4555 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China or Mexico?
Mexico, at 0.4833 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4559 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China and Mexico?
0.0274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Mexico rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China ranks 49th and Mexico ranks 48th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Mexico: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/mexico/">China vs Mexico: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.