Cameroon vs Eswatini: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Cameroon
0.6311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
42nd
Eswatini rank
44th

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Cameroon
  • Eswatini
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.6311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 42nd and Eswatini ranks 44th of 106 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1970s 0.2324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 0.4912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4705 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 0.6272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 0.6558 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 0.914 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 0.6744 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Cameroon or Eswatini?
Cameroon, at 0.6311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Cameroon and Eswatini?
0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Eswatini rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Cameroon ranks 42nd and Eswatini ranks 44th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Eswatini: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/eswatini/">Cameroon vs Eswatini: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
107 places, 5,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.