New Caledonia vs South Africa: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita

New Caledonia
0.0027 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
South Africa
0.0024 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
68th
South Africa rank
71st

Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita over time

  • New Caledonia
  • South Africa
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0027 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person in South Africa, a difference of 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 71st of 107 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0108 1000 Int$ per person 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person 0.01 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1970s 0.01 1000 Int$ per person 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person 0.0087 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1980s 0.0038 1000 Int$ per person 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person 0.0023 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia
1990s 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person 0.0017 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person South Africa
2000s 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person 0.001 1000 Int$ per person South Africa
2010s 0.0019 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person South Africa
2020s 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person 0.0023 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), New Caledonia or South Africa?
New Caledonia, at 0.0027 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between New Caledonia and South Africa?
0.0003 1000 Int$ per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and South Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and South Africa rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
New Caledonia ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 71st of 107 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs South Africa: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/new-caledonia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/new-caledonia/south-africa/">New Caledonia vs South Africa: Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
108 places, 6,096 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.