Japan vs Libya: Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita
Japan
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Libya
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 1972
Japan rank
106th
Libya rank
103rd
Bananas: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita over time
- Japan
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Japan, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per person.
That makes Libya's figure about 46.4 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Japan ranks 106th and Libya ranks 103rd of 107 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 1000 Int$ per person | 0 1000 Int$ per person | 0 1000 Int$ per person | Libya |
| 1970s | 0 1000 Int$ per person | 0 1000 Int$ per person | 0 1000 Int$ per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Japan or Libya?
- Libya, at 0 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Japan as of 1972.
- What is the difference in bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Japan and Libya?
- 0 1000 Int$ per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Libya?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1972.
- How do Japan and Libya rank globally for bananas — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Japan ranks 106th and Libya ranks 103rd of 107 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bananas — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.