Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
61.9 g/cap/d
in 2021
United Republic of Tanzania
59.6 g/cap/d
in 2021
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
15th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
16th

Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0204060200020102021

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 61.9 g/cap/d against 59.6 g/cap/d in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 2.3 g/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 16th of 19 groups.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 55.98 g/cap/d 54.54 g/cap/d 1.44 g/cap/d Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 60.61 g/cap/d 58.08 g/cap/d 2.53 g/cap/d Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 61.9 g/cap/d 59.05 g/cap/d 2.85 g/cap/d Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 61.9 g/cap/d against 59.6 g/cap/d in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2021.
What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
2.3 g/cap/d, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 16th of 19 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-protein-supply-g-cap-day-3-year-average-value/least-developed-countries-ldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-protein-supply-g-cap-day-3-year-average-value/least-developed-countries-ldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
g/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.