Cambodia vs Papua New Guinea: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Cambodia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 61.8 g/cap/d against 61.7 g/cap/d in Cambodia, a difference of 0.1 g/cap/d.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 143rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 141st of 166 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 61.9 g/cap/d | 65.15 g/cap/d | 3.25 g/cap/d | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 61.2 g/cap/d | 61.9 g/cap/d | 0.7 g/cap/d | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Cambodia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 61.8 g/cap/d against 61.7 g/cap/d in Cambodia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Cambodia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.1 g/cap/d, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Papua New Guinea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Cambodia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Cambodia ranks 143rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 141st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.