Armenia vs Peru: Average hourly earnings of employees in agriculture (2021 base)
Average hourly earnings of employees in agriculture (2021 base) over time
- Armenia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4 USD_PPP/cap against 3.85 USD_PPP/cap in Armenia, a difference of 0.15 USD_PPP/cap.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 22nd of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.92 USD_PPP/cap | 1.6 USD_PPP/cap | 0.32 USD_PPP/cap | Armenia |
| 2010s | 2.56 USD_PPP/cap | 2.7 USD_PPP/cap | 0.1487 USD_PPP/cap | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average hourly earnings of employees in agriculture (2021 base), Armenia or Peru?
- Peru, at 4 USD_PPP/cap against 3.85 USD_PPP/cap in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in average hourly earnings of employees in agriculture (2021 base) between Armenia and Peru?
- 0.15 USD_PPP/cap, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Peru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2017.
- How do Armenia and Peru rank globally for average hourly earnings of employees in agriculture (2021 base)?
- Armenia ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 22nd of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average hourly earnings of employees in agriculture (2021 base period) — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.