Malawi vs Togo: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value

Malawi
45 g/cap/d
in 2021
Togo
47 g/cap/d
in 2007
Malawi rank
166th
Togo rank
165th

Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • Malawi
  • Togo
01020304050200020102021

How they compare

Togo currently reports 47 g/cap/d against 45 g/cap/d in Malawi, a difference of 2 g/cap/d.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 166th and Togo ranks 165th of 182 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Malawi or Togo?
Togo, at 47 g/cap/d against 45 g/cap/d in Malawi as of 2007.
What is the difference in average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Malawi and Togo?
2 g/cap/d, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Togo?
8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
How do Malawi and Togo rank globally for average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
Malawi ranks 166th and Togo ranks 165th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
g/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.