Australia vs Belgium: Asses — Stocks, per unit of GDP
Australia
0 An per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium
0 An per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Australia rank
104th
Belgium rank
106th
Asses — Stocks, per unit of GDP over time
- Australia
- Belgium
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 An per US$ of GDP against 0 An per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 An per US$ of GDP.
That makes Australia's figure about 265.4 times Belgium's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 104th and Belgium ranks 106th of 108 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2010s | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | 0 An per US$ of GDP | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asses — stocks, per unit of gdp, Australia or Belgium?
- Australia, at 0 An per US$ of GDP against 0 An per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in asses — stocks, per unit of gdp between Australia and Belgium?
- 0 An per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belgium?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Belgium rank globally for asses — stocks, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 104th and Belgium ranks 106th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Asses — Stocks, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asses — Stocks divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.