Romania vs South Africa: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre

Romania
0.1318 An per square kilometre
in 2017
South Africa
0.1177 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
59th
South Africa rank
60th

Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre over time

  • Romania
  • South Africa
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.1318 An per square kilometre against 0.1177 An per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0141 An per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Romania ranks 59th and South Africa ranks 60th of 109 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1235 An per square kilometre 0.2531 An per square kilometre 0.1296 An per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0.1539 An per square kilometre 0.1742 An per square kilometre 0.0203 An per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.1542 An per square kilometre 0.1731 An per square kilometre 0.0189 An per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.1423 An per square kilometre 0.1731 An per square kilometre 0.0308 An per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.1266 An per square kilometre 0.1238 An per square kilometre 0.0028 An per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.1307 An per square kilometre 0.126 An per square kilometre 0.0047 An per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — stocks, per square kilometre, Romania or South Africa?
Romania, at 0.1318 An per square kilometre against 0.1177 An per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2017.
What is the difference in asses — stocks, per square kilometre between Romania and South Africa?
0.0141 An per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for asses — stocks, per square kilometre?
Romania ranks 59th and South Africa ranks 60th of 109 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs South Africa: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-per-square-kilometre/romania/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-per-square-kilometre/romania/south-africa/">Romania vs South Africa: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
110 places, 6,250 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Asses — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.