Ecuador vs South Africa: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.1368 An per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0.1177 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
58th
South Africa rank
60th

Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.1368 An per square kilometre against 0.1177 An per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0191 An per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 58th and South Africa ranks 60th of 109 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6043 An per square kilometre 0.2531 An per square kilometre 0.3512 An per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.683 An per square kilometre 0.1742 An per square kilometre 0.5088 An per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.7552 An per square kilometre 0.1731 An per square kilometre 0.5821 An per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.9802 An per square kilometre 0.1731 An per square kilometre 0.8071 An per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.6993 An per square kilometre 0.1238 An per square kilometre 0.5755 An per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.3422 An per square kilometre 0.1245 An per square kilometre 0.2177 An per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.1532 An per square kilometre 0.1171 An per square kilometre 0.0361 An per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — stocks, per square kilometre, Ecuador or South Africa?
Ecuador, at 0.1368 An per square kilometre against 0.1177 An per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — stocks, per square kilometre between Ecuador and South Africa?
0.0191 An per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for asses — stocks, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 58th and South Africa ranks 60th of 109 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
110 places, 6,250 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Asses — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.