Belgium vs Suriname: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre
Belgium
0.0001 An per square kilometre
in 2017
Suriname
0 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
104th
Suriname rank
106th
Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre over time
- Belgium
- Suriname
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.0001 An per square kilometre against 0 An per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0001 An per square kilometre.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.8 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Suriname ahead.
Belgium ranks 104th and Suriname ranks 106th of 109 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 An per square kilometre | 0.0001 An per square kilometre | 0 An per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.0001 An per square kilometre | 0 An per square kilometre | 0 An per square kilometre | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asses — stocks, per square kilometre, Belgium or Suriname?
- Belgium, at 0.0001 An per square kilometre against 0 An per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2017.
- What is the difference in asses — stocks, per square kilometre between Belgium and Suriname?
- 0.0001 An per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Suriname?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Suriname rank globally for asses — stocks, per square kilometre?
- Belgium ranks 104th and Suriname ranks 106th of 109 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asses — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.