Australia vs Zambia: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre

Australia
0.0002 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.003 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
103rd
Zambia rank
100th

Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Zambia
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.003 An per square kilometre against 0.0002 An per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0028 An per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 12.4 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 103rd and Zambia ranks 100th of 109 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 An per square kilometre 0.0013 An per square kilometre 0.0007 An per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0006 An per square kilometre 0.0013 An per square kilometre 0.0007 An per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0005 An per square kilometre 0.0016 An per square kilometre 0.0011 An per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0003 An per square kilometre 0.0023 An per square kilometre 0.002 An per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0003 An per square kilometre 0.0025 An per square kilometre 0.0022 An per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0003 An per square kilometre 0.0028 An per square kilometre 0.0026 An per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0002 An per square kilometre 0.003 An per square kilometre 0.0027 An per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — stocks, per square kilometre, Australia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.003 An per square kilometre against 0.0002 An per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — stocks, per square kilometre between Australia and Zambia?
0.0028 An per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for asses — stocks, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 103rd and Zambia ranks 100th of 109 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zambia: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-per-square-kilometre/australia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-per-square-kilometre/australia/zambia/">Australia vs Zambia: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
110 places, 6,250 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Asses — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.