Australia vs Libya: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre

Australia
0.0002 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0.0009 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
103rd
Libya rank
101st

Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Libya
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.0009 An per square kilometre against 0.0002 An per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0007 An per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 3.8 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 103rd and Libya ranks 101st of 109 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 An per square kilometre 0.0675 An per square kilometre 0.0669 An per square kilometre Libya
1970s 0.0006 An per square kilometre 0.0379 An per square kilometre 0.0373 An per square kilometre Libya
1980s 0.0005 An per square kilometre 0.0343 An per square kilometre 0.0338 An per square kilometre Libya
1990s 0.0003 An per square kilometre 0.019 An per square kilometre 0.0187 An per square kilometre Libya
2000s 0.0003 An per square kilometre 0.0168 An per square kilometre 0.0165 An per square kilometre Libya
2010s 0.0003 An per square kilometre 0.0166 An per square kilometre 0.0164 An per square kilometre Libya
2020s 0.0002 An per square kilometre 0.008 An per square kilometre 0.0078 An per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — stocks, per square kilometre, Australia or Libya?
Libya, at 0.0009 An per square kilometre against 0.0002 An per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — stocks, per square kilometre between Australia and Libya?
0.0007 An per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Libya rank globally for asses — stocks, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 103rd and Libya ranks 101st of 109 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Libya: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-per-square-kilometre/australia/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/asses-stocks-per-square-kilometre/australia/libya/">Australia vs Libya: Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Stocks, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
110 places, 6,250 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Asses — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.