Lithuania vs Pakistan: Arable land
Lithuania
36.8%
in 2023
Pakistan
39.3%
in 2023
Lithuania rank
16th
Pakistan rank
14th
Arable land over time
- Lithuania
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 39.3% against 36.8% in Lithuania, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 16th and Pakistan ranks 14th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45.4% | 39.7% | 5.7% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 30.0% | 39.5% | 9.5% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 35.0% | 39.6% | 4.5% | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 36.4% | 39.5% | 3.0% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land, Lithuania or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 39.3% against 36.8% in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in arable land between Lithuania and Pakistan?
- 2.5%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Pakistan rank globally for arable land?
- Lithuania ranks 16th and Pakistan ranks 14th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and website, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (% of land area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.