India vs Republic of Moldova: Arable land
Arable land over time
- India
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 56.8% against 51.8% in India, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.1 times India's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was India ahead.
India ranks 5th and Republic of Moldova ranks 4th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54.4% | 53.9% | 0.5% | India |
| 2000s | 53.6% | 55.7% | 2.1% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 52.6% | 53.4% | 0.9% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 51.8% | 56.6% | 4.8% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land, India or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 56.8% against 51.8% in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in arable land between India and Republic of Moldova?
- 5.0%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do India and Republic of Moldova rank globally for arable land?
- India ranks 5th and Republic of Moldova ranks 4th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and website, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (% of land area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.