Chile vs Guam: Arable land
Chile
1.9%
in 2023
Guam
1.9%
in 2023
Chile rank
171st
Guam rank
173rd
Arable land over time
- Chile
- Guam
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1.9% against 1.9% in Guam, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 171st and Guam ranks 173rd of 206 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Guam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.0% | 3.7% | 1.3% | Chile |
| 1970s | 5.4% | 3.7% | 1.7% | Chile |
| 1980s | 4.6% | 3.7% | 0.9% | Chile |
| 1990s | 3.0% | 3.7% | 0.7% | Guam |
| 2000s | 2.0% | 3.1% | 1.1% | Guam |
| 2010s | 1.9% | 1.9% | 0.1% | Chile |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 1.9% | 0.0% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land, Chile or Guam?
- Chile, at 1.9% against 1.9% in Guam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in arable land between Chile and Guam?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Guam rank globally for arable land?
- Chile ranks 171st and Guam ranks 173rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and website, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (% of land area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.